The recent rise in food prices continues to baffle and frustrate the public, echoing the struggles faced under the previous government. Despite the fall of the previous administration, which was largely attributed to its failure to manage commodity prices, the promised relief has yet to materialize. The ongoing instability in food markets has only compounded public confusion and discontent. The food and non-food inflation rose 1.94 basis points to 11.66 percent in July from the previous month, according to data released by the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics.
When the previous government was ousted, the central rallying cry from citizens across all strata was a demand for effective control over commodity prices. The expectation was clear: that the new interim government would address these concerns with urgency and precision. However, the reality has been disheartening. Despite various measures taken by the current administration, such as reducing import duties on essential goods like potatoes, onions, and pesticides, the market impact has been minimal.
For instance, recent announcements by the National Board of Revenue (NBR) have reduced import duties on both onions and potatoes, as well as on pesticides necessary for cultivation. Yet, this intervention has yet to translate into lower prices at the consumer level. Onions are still being sold at Tk 110 to Tk 120 per kilogram, while potatoes remain at Tk 55 to Tk 60 per kilogram in retail markets. The reduction in import duties has not seemingly impacted these prices, raising questions about the effectiveness of these measures.
Similarly, while a significant importation of eggs from India was reported-over 2 lakh 31 thousand eggs arriving at Benapole land port-the expected reduction in egg prices has not been observed. Eggs continue to be sold at Tk 160 per dozen, despite the initial low prices of imported eggs. This disconnect between policy action and market outcomes is troubling.
The situation is further exacerbated by the persistent high prices of vegetables in the capital's markets. The public's patience is wearing thin, and there is a growing concern that continued inaction could lead to unrest. Such a scenario is undesirable for all parties, as it not only undermines public trust but also creates economic instability.
The crux of the issue lies in the effectiveness of the government's interventions. It is crucial for the administration to address not just the symptoms but also the root causes of the problem. Measures must go beyond superficial adjustments; they need to tackle the underlying issues such as market syndicates, corruption, and extortion. Only by dismantling these barriers can genuine relief be achieved.
Moreover, achieving self-sufficiency in food production should be a priority. By enhancing local agricultural output and reducing dependency on imports, the government can help stabilize prices and ensure a more reliable food supply.
In conclusion, the current administration has a significant opportunity to restore public trust and demonstrate its commitment to addressing the real issues affecting food prices. The path forward requires decisive action and a concerted effort to address market inefficiencies and ensure that the benefits of policy changes reach the consumer. Only then can peace and stability be restored, and the government can fulfill its promise of alleviating the public's economic burden.
.png "Halim-&-Firni")
